'Fundamental review' sees rail maintenance brought in-house

Network Rail has announced that it is to bring rail maintenance activity back in-house, and so unify the operation and maintenance of Britain's rail infrastructure.

Today’s announcement represents the "most fundamental restructuring" of Britain’s railway since British Rail was reorganised in 1994, two years before privatisation. The decision to transfer some 18,500 people from infrastructure maintenance contractors (IMCs) to Network Rail was taken following "careful consideration of the conclusions of a fundamental review" of rail maintenance that has been carried out over the last six months.

The move will see contracts currently held by the seven Infrastructure Maintenance Contractors transferred to the government-assisted company.

Network Rail’s says the move will deliver high standards of rail maintenance across the rail network, significant efficiency savings, and continued improvement in trackside safety standards.

The exact timing of taking each individual rail maintenance contract in-house is subject to "detailed commercial negotiations" and safety case approvals. The speed of progress will also be dictated by the need to ensure a smooth transition.

The current structure of outsourced rail maintenance involves seven IMCs - Amec, Amey, Balfour Beatty, Carillion, Jarvis, First Engineering and Serco – 20 contract areas, "considerable management duplication and complex reporting, hand-back and inspection procedures".

Network Rail says that there will be a single management structure with "clear lines of accountability and a simplified relationship between operations and maintenance". The company will ensure that maintenance is carried out by a permanent workforce of "well-trained individuals committed to a strong safety culture".

Ian McAllister, Chairman of Network Rail, said: “Rail maintenance is a central part of Network Rail’s operation. We have completed a detailed assessment of railway maintenance and obtained a clear understanding of the reasons why costs have risen in recent years. Bringing maintenance contracts in-house will ensure greater consistency of maintenance standards and help deliver efficiency savings far more quickly than would otherwise have been possible.

“We have thought long and hard before taking this decision. We have studied its implications in great detail and concluded that it is the right thing to do."


Related UK National News Stories
Click here for the latest headlines.

10 October 2003
Jarvis pulls out of rail maintenance contracts
The rail maintenance company Jarvis – which is currently being investigated following the Potter's Bar rail crash – has announced today that it is to "exit rail maintenance contracts" for "commercial" reasons.
08 November 2011
High Speed Rail Network Gets Backing
A government committee has announced that a high-speed rail link between London and Birmingham has a "good case". The announcement comes after the Government carried out a public consultation on the proposal and the recommended route for an initial high-speed line from London to the West Midlands.
09 October 2008
Scottish Rail Strike Suspended
Scottish rail services are expected to return to normal after talks between Network Rail and the Rail Maritime and Transport (RMT) union lead to a suspension of the 24-hour strike scheduled for noon.
13 January 2012
Legal Action Taken Over Cumbrian Rail Crash
It has been revealed that Network rail is to be prosecuted over the Cumbrian rail crash back in 2007, which claimed one life. The rail regulation body, The Office of Rail Regulation (ORR) has said that they have started legal proceedings against Network Rail for a breach of health and safety law.
27 April 2004
Firms accept liability for Potters Bar rail crash
In a joint statement made today Network Rail and Jarvis plc have formally accepted liability for the 2002 Potters Bar rail crash. Network Rail and Jarvis said they hoped that by "formalising the liability issue, those affected by the tragedy will gain some level of comfort and assistance".