Lib Dems deride ID card scheme as costly and insecure

The Home Secretary's new ID cards will be costly for the public, insecure and will divert funds away from policing, according to the Liberal Democrats.

The Lib Dem frontbencher was speaking after the Home Office announced yesterday that "further improvements" to the ID card would include producing a single, universal ID card for all UK nationals to be issued alongside passports.

A new executive agency will also be set up incorporating the UK Passport Service and working closely with the Home Office's Immigration and Nationality Directorate.

The Home Office made its "refinements" in response to the Home Affairs Select Committee report on ID cards published yesterday.

Lib Dems home affairs spokesperson Mark Oaten said that the cost to the public seemed to escalate with every government announcement.

"It appears that when you next renew your passport you will have no choice but to spend £35 on a stand-alone ID card, on top of a £73 charge for the passport," he said.

“On top of our existing concerns about the card’s ability to tackle crime and terrorism, there is increasing evidence to suggest that biometric technology is not as foolproof as the government claims. At the very least Ministers should find out if the technology works before committing us to ID cards.

The government would be much better off spending the £3 billion set aside for ID cards on getting more police onto our streets, and ensuring that the intelligence services are properly resourced to tackle terrorism, the Lib Dem frontbencher added.

Home Secretary David Blunkett said yesterday that following the Parliamentary report into the scheme, there would also be a standardised on-line verification service that will make the system "more secure against fraud and provide a full audit trail".

Mr Blunkett said: "Biometric ID cards will provide a simple and secure means of verifying identity.

"Together with electronic border controls they will help us tackle illegal migration and working, organised crime, terrorist activity, identity theft, and fraudulent access to public services, as well as helping our citizens travel freely and complete everyday transactions securely and easily."

He welcomed pre-legislative scrutiny and consultation as a "key part" of the long-term approach being taken to introduce ID cards.


Related UK National News Stories
Click here for the latest headlines.

22 August 2013
Customers To Be Reimbursed Following Mis-Sold CPP Card Protection
The Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) has reached an agreement with Card Protection Plan Limited (CPP) and 13 high street banks and credit card issuers, that will pave the way for redress to be paid to customers who were mis-sold CPP's Card Protection and Identity Protection policies.
08 October 2003
M&S backtracks over &More credit card after OFT probe
Marks and Spencer Financial Services (MSFS) has changed the way it will offer to replace its store cards by the &More credit card after action by the Office of Fair Trading. MSFS had sent out letters to many card holders saying that its store card would automatically be replaced by the &More credit card unless card holders objected.
09 October 2006
Cost of ID card scheme revealed
The government has revealed that the cost of the controversial ID card scheme will be £5.4 million over the next ten years. It is the first time that a figure for the total cost of the project, including all the set-up and operational costs of the scheme, has been released.
30 July 2009
UK Identity Card Unveiled
The image of the ID card for British citizens was officially unveiled by the Home Secretary today in Manchester and London. The ID card, which can also be used as a travel document in Europe, was revealed by the Home Secretary at St Pancras International Station in London and to residents of Greater Manchester at an event in the city centre.
30 July 2004
MPs critical of muddled ID card scheme
The government's ID card policy is in a muddle and the public, whilst supportive in principle, has "little enthusiasm" for paying the kind of fees being suggested, according to a powerful committee of MPs.