18/09/2008

Calls For A National Bursary Scheme

Serious shortcomings in how bursaries are awarded to students from poorer backgrounds have been highlighted in a report by an independent think tank.

The Higher Education Policy Institute (Hepi) believes a national bursary scheme should be established to ensure that all disadvantaged university students receive the financial help they need.

The report points to the uneven distribution of poorer students across the higher education sector, saying this distorts the current market in bursaries.

Bahram Bekhradnia, director of Hepi, said: "The problem with the present arrangement, from the students' point of view, is what a poor student receives as a bursary has nothing to do with what their needs are. Instead, it's got everything to do with how many other poor students there are studying at the same university. If the bursaries a university has to give has to be distributed between more people, that means they then have a smaller value.

"With the same amount of money, less socially inclusive universities have fewer poor students to distribute money to, which means much bigger bursaries."

Mr Bekhradnia said that under current arrangements, there was an incentive for bright poor students to go to a university with fewer poor students because it meant a bigger bursary.

The Hepi report calls for a national bursary scheme which would offer a standard level of support to students on a means-tested basis.

This would be funded from pooled income from universities, with institutions passing their contributions directly to the government.

The review found that research intensive Russell Group universities would give bursaries of around £1,700 per student, other institutions gave bursaries of around £700. It argued that a national bursary scheme would mean equality between disadvantaged students and a simpler system.

Director general of Russell Group, Dr Wendy Piatt, said: "A national bursary system would create many losers and few winners as there would be relatively small increases to a standard bursary but many high-achieving, low-income students would lose out on substantial support currently available."

However the NUS said the report backed up what it had been saying for years, NUS president Wes Streeting, said: "The current system is complex and confusing.

"We need a single national bursary scheme, so that financial support is based on what students need, not where they study."

Bill Rammell, England's Minister for Higher Education, said it was for institutions themselves, subject to approval from Offa (the Office for Fair Access), to decide how to support their students.

(GK/JM)

Related UK National News Stories
Click here for the latest headlines.

29 June 2011
Medical Student Finance, A Step In The Right Direction, Says BMA


The government’s announcement of temporary measures for next year aimed at preserving financial support for medical students is a step in the right direction, but it must become a long term settlement, medical student leaders have said.
21 February 2005
BMA seek pooled job applications for students
The British Medical Association (BMA) Medical Students Committee have called for a centralised body, through which graduates can apply for their first job.
08 September 2004
Tories pledge to scrap fees and funnel £21bn more into education
A Conservative government would provide an extra £21 billion investment in higher education, and scrap student fees in favour of loans, it has emerged today.
17 October 2003
Top-up fees will discourage students from medicine: BMA
The BMA's Medical Students Committee has expressed concerns that top-up fees will discourage students - particularly those from working class backgrounds - from applying to medical school.
13 September 2005
Nurses’ debts increasing, survey reveals
The number of student nurses with debts of more than £10,000 has doubled within two years, new research has revealed. A survey of 2,000 student nurses, conducted by ‘Nursing Times’ and health workers’ union Unison, found that 13% had debts totalling more than £10,000 in 2005, compared to 6% in 2003.