Down's Syndrome Screening Examined

A new screening strategy has halved the number of infants born with Down's syndrome and increased the number diagnosed before birth by 30%, according to a study published on the British Medical Journal's website, bmj.com, today.

The authors point out that the value of this new screening strategy - in Denmark - is that all women can be assessed early in pregnancy.

They said that many countries, including England, Australia and New Zealand, are trying to introduce national screening strategies for Down's syndrome, but are facing a variety of problems because of a lack of consensus about the screening policy and logistical challenges.

In 2004, the Danish National Board of Health issued new guidelines for prenatal screening and diagnosis.

These included the offer of a combined test for Down's syndrome (based on combination of maternal age, plus serum and nuchal screening) in the first trimester.

This test gave women a risk assessment for Down’s syndrome at an early stage in the pregnancy. Women whose risk was higher than a defined cut off were referred for invasive diagnostic tests (chorionic villus sampling or amniocentesis).

In the previous guidelines, screening was based on maternal age and a diagnostic test was mainly offered to women above 35 years.
News Image
Professor Ann Tabor and colleagues from Denmark, evaluated the impact of the new national screening strategy on the number of infants born with Down's syndrome and the number of referrals for invasive procedures.

They analysed data from the 19 Danish departments of gynaecology and obstetrics and the national cytogenetic registry for an average of 65,000 births each year between 2000 and 2007.

Uptake was good and by June 2006 all 15 Danish counties followed the guidelines from 2004 and offered the new screening strategy. In 2006 approximately 84% of pregnant women had a risk assessment for Down's syndrome.

The researchers found that the new strategy was associated with improved earlier detection of Down’s syndrome, low false positive rates, and more than a 50% decrease in the number of invasive tests carried out each year.

They report that the number of infants born with the syndrome decreased from 55–65 per year during 2000–4, to 31 in 2005 and 32 in 2006. The total number of invasive tests fell sharply from 7524 in 2000 to 3510 in 2006.

The detection rate in the screened population was 86% in 2005 and 93% in 2006. With 3.9% (17) of women receiving a false positive result in 2005 and 3.3% (7) in 2006.

However, the national guidelines emphasise that risk assessment should only be done if women choose the test on the basis of informed choice, therefore despite the programme being available to all pregnant in women in Denmark, some will still choose not to be screened.


Related UK National News Stories
Click here for the latest headlines.

02 July 2003
Charity outlines guidelines for cervical screenings
All women aged between 25 and 49 should be offered cervical screening every three years – but five years is regular enough for women aged 50 to 64 – according to a new report by Cancer Research UK.
17 June 2009
Wealth And Ethnicity 'Linked To Whether Women Have Breast And Cervical Screening'
White British women are more likely to have had a cervical screening and there is more chance that women who own a car and/or home have had a mammogram, according to research published on bmj.com today.
11 November 2003
Guidance on Down's syndrome testing published
Guidance for health professionals on more accurate tests for Down's syndrome screening has been published by the Department of Health today.
15 January 2004
Chlamydia screening programme widens
Public Health Minister Melanie Johnson today announced further roll-out of the chlamydia screening programme to cover 16 new areas of England. Chlamydia is the country's most common sexually transmitted infection (STI) with as many as one-in-10 people infected with the disease.
30 October 2012
Breast Cancer Screening Leads To 'Over Diagnoses'
Women are to be nformed over breast cancer screening issues in the UK after a review highlights the potential harms of being tested. The review panel, led by Prof Michael Marmot, from University College London, found screening had "contributed to reducing deaths" but also "resulted in some overdiagnosis".